I got my new Camera (and a sweet lens)

So I decided on the Nikon D40. It is a lower end DSLR but it still has outstanding performance in low light and in general takes great pictures. I originally looked at the Canon XTi vs XSi vs Nikon D40 vs D60. Here the rationale of my choice:

  1. Cheap, I paid $400 for the body and an 18-55 lens.
  2. It gets great reviews, see ken rockwell's review as well as dpreview
  3. Nikon has a wide variety of excellent very flexible lens particularly the 18-105VR (Vibration reduction) and 18-200 VR
  4. Great low light performance, see dpreview above.
  5. Super lightweight, even with my new bigger 18-105 lens
  6. Nikon also makes the D90 which is in the Canon 40D 50D range that has video. I have a clear upgrade path.

The only real drawbacks this camera has I did think were that important name a CCD rather than CMOS sensor and slower continuous shooting 2.5FPS versus 3.5FPS. So far this is a great camera.

Nikon D40 w/ 18-55 Lens

I originally got into the digital SLR market because I was tired of waiting seconds, like 5-10 or more with flash,  for my point and shooter to turn on. I also don't like the shutter lag that has caused me to miss so many shots of my kids. I originally really liked the idea of the Pentax, because the Vibration reduction is in the body it works with every lens Pentax has made for the last 30 years. However, when I tried out the camera it felt too big and the lens was really slow compared to the Nikons and Canons. I did a lot more research and changed my finalists to the Canon XTi and the Nikon D40. When Nikon released the D90 w/18-105 lens it kind of pushed me over the line for Nikon. The new 18-105 lens was pretty affordable (much less than the Canon equivalent) and there was an upgrade path to video.

 I bought my camera from PCConnection for $400 shipped and a few weeks later bought the Nikon 18-105 lens from an authorized reseller on Ebay for $200 shipped after Microsoft cashback. In retrospect I may have done a little better on the body but $600 for both body and lens is about the same as the Canon with kit lens.

Well, now I have owned the camera for a couple weeks, was it worth it? Absolutely! It is so fast, focusing and charging the flash and has almost no shutter lag. It also has this cool feature that will automatically increase the ISO to allow for faster shutter speeds in low light. (You can set the speed at which it steps as well as the max sensitivity). As the camera has pretty good performance at high iso this is a great feature it has allowed us to take a lot of pictures we never would have gotten with our point and shooter. The new lens is also amazing. It gives that extra reach you so often want and the VR lets me take much slower shots then I ever would have been able to with a normal lens.  At the end of the day this is a great camera, we get great pictures and miss so much less. What a pleasure.

Comments

 I bought my camera from

 I bought my camera from PCConnection for $400 shipped and a few weeks later bought the Nikon 18-105 lens from an authorized reseller on Ebay for $200 shipped after Microsoft cashback. In retrospect I may have done a little better on the body but $600 for both body and lens is about the same as the Canon with kit lens. insurance quotes

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.